Posted on

You Are One With The Master

“But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit”
1 Corinthians 6:17

 

The believer and Jesus are one. Jesus said, “I am the vine, ye are the branches . . .” (1 John 15:5). When you look at a tree you don’t think of the branches as one part. You see it as one – as a unity. All who believe in Him are one with Christ. Our spirits are one with Him.

 

How are you demonstrating this unity in today’s divisive environment?
Posted on

You Are A New Creature

“. . . but though our outward man perish,
yet the inward man is renewed day by day”
(2 Corinthians 4:16)

 

In the New Birth, our spirits are recreated, our bodies are not. It is in our spirit where all things have become new. We still have the same bodies we always had. There is a man who lives inside the body. Paul calls him “the inward man of the heart” (1 Peter 3:4).

 

This man is hidden to the physical eye. No one can see the real you – the inward man. They may think they do but they only see the house you live in. You are on the inside looking out. The same thing is true with the people you know; you’ve never really seen the real man on the inside.

 

When a man’s house is decaying, the real man still lives. The real man never dies. It is this inward man who is born into the family of God, who is in perfect union with the Master.
Posted on

You Are A Child of God

 

No truth in all the Bible is as far reaching as the blessed fact that when we are born again into the family of God – God the Father is our Father. He cares for us! He is interested in us, each of us individually, not just as a group, or as a body, or a church. He is interested in each of His children and loves each one of us with the same love.

 

Get acquainted with your Father through the Word. When you were saved, you were born into His family as a spiritual body. Babies in the natural must eat natural food to develop and grow. The Bible instructs the children of God: “As newborn babies, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby . . . “ (1 Peter 2:2).

 

It is in the Word where we find out about our Father, about His love, His nature, how He cares for us, and how He loves us. He is everything the Word says He is. He will do everything the Word says He will do.
Posted on

Getting To Know You

If I knew you and you knew me,
and each of us could clearly see
by the inner light divine
the meaning of your heart and mine;
I’m sure that we would differ less
and clap our hands in friendliness.
If you knew me and I knew you.
Howard Thurman

 

Understanding the complexity of human beings takes time, effort, and imagination. One must ‘fool around’ the edges of another’s life getting closer and closer to the central place. There must be a will to understand which informs the integrity of one’s desire to understand. 2022 can be a year we step out and lead the critical conversations that will heal our nation.
The Bible teaches us in Ephesians and Colossians how to accomplish this, “Let no unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building up the one in need and bringing grace to those who listen.” And that, “Your speech must always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person.”
The Foundation for Critical Thinking offers, “much of our thinking left to itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed or down-right prejudiced. Yet the quality of the life we produce, make, or build depends precisely on the quality of our thoughts. Shoddy thinking is costly to our spiritual witness. Excellence in thought, however, must be systematically cultivated.”
We naturally think from our own perspective, from a point of view which tends to privilege our position. Fairness implies the treating of all relevant viewpoints alike without reference to one’s own feelings or interest. Because we tend to be biased in favor of our own viewpoint, it is important to keep the standard of fairness at the forefront of our thinking. This is especially important when the situation may call on us to see things we don’t want to see or give something up that we want to hold onto.
Most people do not understand the degree to which they have uncritically internalized the dominant prejudice of their society or culture. Sociologist and anthropologists identify this as the state of being “cultural bound.” This phenomenon is caused by sociocentric thinking, which includes:

  • The uncritical tendency to place one’s culture, nation, religion above all others,

 

  • The uncritical tendency to select self-serving positive descriptions of ourselves and negative descriptions of those who think differently from us,

 

  • The uncritical tendency to internalize group norms and beliefs, take on group identities, and act as we are expected to act—without the least sense that what we are doing might reasonably be questioned,

 

  • The tendency to blindly conform to group restrictions (many which are arbitrary or coercive),

 

  • The failure to think beyond the traditional prejudices of one’s culture,

 

  • The failure to study and internalize the insights of other cultures (improving thereby the breath and depth of one’s thinking),

 

  • The failure to realize that mass media in every culture shapes the news from the point of view of that culture,

Sociocentric thinking is a hallmark of an uncritical society. It can be diminished only when replaced by cross-cultural, fair-minded thinking.
Let’s move into 2022 with a new mind, the mind of Christ. It means we share Jesus’ perspective of humility and obedience (Philippians 2:5-8), compassion (Matthew 9:36), and prayerful dependence on God (Luke 5:16). The believer bears a responsibility to yield to the Spirit’s leading (Ephesians 4:30) and to allow the Spirit to transform and renew our mind (Romans 12:1-2).
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Posted on

Praying With Anger – Part 2

Part 1 laid bare how emotional attachments that leads to anger are the defeat of expectations. Today, in Part 2, we will explore how anger can obscure our ability to think objectively and rationally, leading to choices that don’t honor God.
“Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everybody” Colossians 4:6
More people have a short fuse lately. It’s getting harder for people to muster empathy or regulate our knee-jerk reactions.
“When you anticipate something is going to be temporary, you’re able to absorb a higher level of stress. When things don’t work out as expected it makes us more prone to be aggressive with ourselves and with one another,” says Pauline Wallin, a psychologist in Camp Hill, Pa.
Reports of poor treatment ranged from inappropriate language to rudeness to sexual harassment to sparring over mask and vaccine policies:
  • A woman pulled a gun on servers at a Philadelphia fast food restaurant when they asked her to order online.
  • A California woman was charged with felony assault for attacking a Southwest airlines flight attendant and dislodging some of her teeth.
Of course, it’s the people-have-lost-their-ever loving-minds incidents that make the news, but they are also a reflection of a deeper trend.
Once activated, anger can color people’s perceptions, form their decisions, and guide their behavior, regardless of whether the decisions at hand are related to the source of their anger.
I don’t know what it’s like to be you, and you don’t know what it’s like to be me. But by the grace of God, we can see each other‘s hearts.  Just because we don’t always agree doesn’t mean we have to be enemies. If we take a moment to listen to each other, we will find we are more alike than different. While the politicians use division and anger for their political gain, God uses the beauty of our diversity for unification.
Given that anger has the potential to grip a nation over a sustained period, it is important to understand how it may shape individual choices over time. By shaping basic cognitive and social processes, anger shapes our decisions and the lives we lead.
Politicians have done a great job at understanding that being in a negative mood can lead a person to form relatively pessimistic expectations, whereas being in a positive mood can lead to relatively optimistic expectations.
As Aristotle wrote, “angry decision makers may have a difficult time being angry at the right time, for the right purpose, and in the right way. Their emotional experiences and appraisals may hinder their ability to view a situation objectively and rationally. Instead, they approach situations with confidence, a sense of control, and negative thoughts about others. These appraisal tendencies may cascade into undesirable outcomes in some situations, such as aggression, unrealistic optimism, and overconfidence.”
We may have allowed anger to become entrenched in our lives by habitual practice. Still, we can also practice responding correctly until that, too, becomes a habit the watching world sees, and God is glorified in our response.
You will know your anger is controlling you when:
  • your desires are more important than Spiritual desires;
  • when you disregard scripture;
  • when you demand personal satisfaction when you are not satisfied.
Selfishness not only leads to wrong thinking, but it also leads to wrongdoing.
How do we disregard scripture? Proverbs also tell us that “Whoever is slow to anger has great understanding, but he who has a hasty temper exalts folly” (14:29). Ecclesiastes advises us not to be “quick in your spirit to become angry, for anger lodges in the bosom of fools” (7:9). Thus, it is wise to imitate God in his patience and be slow to anger because it is foolish to give in to your temper. When interacting with others, “a soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger” (Proverbs 15:1). We should be slow to anger so that we are able instead to respond with grace.
Be angry, but do not sin, and rather “ponder in your own hearts on your beds and be silent” (Psalm 4:4). Our response to feelings of anger should not be rash but should be quiet and thoughtful.
Anger itself is not a sin, but intense, unrestrained emotion can lead very quickly to corruption. As God said to Cain, “It’s desire is for you, but you must rule over it” (Genesis 4:7). In the same way, we must not let our feelings of anger lead us into sin, but we must master them and restrain them so that, like God, we can be “slow to anger and abounding in love and compassion.”
Posted on

Is God “Woke”?

In Exodus 3, it says God is deeply concerned about the cries of our sisters and brothers. As Christians, we are to interrupt injustice, not lead the fight for it. Maybe God was too “woke” and didn’t understand our need to satisfy self-interest through injustice, poverty, persecution, and legislated discrimination. Maybe, His Word didn’t take into consideration that someday we would have to live out the Imago Dei – “all are created in the image of God.“ Could God really expect us to treat everyone with dignity, honor, and respect?

 

Let’s face it, focusing on others before ourselves, treating all people as equal, and trusting that the Word will transform hearts requires us to give up our controlling spirit. We all have an idea of what following Jesus should look like and who should be included. But if we’re honest with ourselves, our views are often influenced by our cultural values, politics, background, and what’s currently going on in the world around us. Maybe God was too woke to understand where we are today. How could He ask us to love our enemies!

 

Woke is a term that refers to awareness of issues that concern social justice. Originating in the 1940’s as “being aware of the truth behind things ‘the man’ doesn’t want you to know”. Today, in culture and politics, the most prominent uses of “woke” are as a pejorative. However, despite todays vagueness, you now see evangelicals, conservative activists and Republican politicians constantly using the term. That’s because that vagueness is a feature, not a bug. Casting a really wide range of ideas and policies as too woke and anyone who is critical of them as being canceled by out-of-control liberals is becoming an important strategy and tool.

 

Some Christian leaders are using a blanket rejection to dismiss the realities of racism, implementing attempts to dictate the belief systems, definitions, authoritative binding, academic and ecclesiastical decisions regarding how race is to be communicated in the local church, school, and community.

 

Ed Stetzer, a Southern Baptist and the executive director of the Wheaton College Billy Graham Center, says that churches have become increasingly politicized. “What’s happened is that people are now sorting themselves into churches that align more with their political ideology than their theology,” he said. “They want the sermons they hear on Sundays to align with what they hear on cable news all week.”

 

The controversy within the Southern Baptist Conference shines a light on the generational and ideological divides churches across the country are facing today. According to Ian Lovett of the WSJ, “one faction argues the SBC should step back from its role in electoral politics to broaden its reach and reverse a 15-year decline in membership. Another faction says the denomination has been drifting to the left, and the way to retain and attract members is to recommit to its conservative roots and stay politically engaged. Each side accuses the other of straying from the SBC’s core mission.”

 

 

Churches across America have come to provide further evidence of this political divide. Like the SBC, factions are not focused on what Jesus is focused on – love of neighbor, mercy, kindness, and grace. Instead, focusing on demands of political loyalty, disputes about racism, assigning the most negative labeling possible to those considered the enemy, and determining who is and isn’t “conservative enough.”

 

“It’s like someone is bleeding out on the floor,
and these guys are fighting over
how many pints of blood a person can lose.”

 

SBC seminary presidents organized a letter last year denouncing one of their major points of division, critical race theory—an academic set of assertions about structural racism across society that has been a flashpoint in the denomination. They and other conservatives acknowledge historic patterns of racism but don’t want it taught to their kids, talked about, or resolved. But they also say racism can have “structural forms.” Efforts to address the central issue being lifted up are met with gaslighting, denial, minimization, and ostracization.

 

Ve Lu of Nonprofit AF summarizes it this way, “So many of us are in denial. Not always denial like refusing to acknowledge what exists. More so, the subtle denial that we ourselves, who are Good People fighting for a just and equitable world, could further supremacy. After all, we weren’t involved in the acts of genocide at Kamloops or Tulsa, we tell ourselves. This is what makes white supremacy so potent. It is often subtle. It happens in ways we often don’t think about.”

 

The cognitive dissonance some guard elicits very negative responses to any attempt to discuss this subject. Breaking through the initial discomfort and rejection of this new information causes people’s defenses to go up, and they disengage. It’s not easy to swallow the realization that you are the transgressors of micro-aggressions on a micro-scale and that you have been unwitting participants in oppression on an aggregate/macro scale.

 

Church, we look disingenuous to the watching world. Our witness is being weakened as we are acting like the world. We are to be “in this world, but not of this world.” In John 17, Jesus asked the Father to

 

“sanctify them in the truth; your Word is truth.
As you sent me into the world,
so I have sent them into the world.
And for their sake, I consecrate myself,
that they also may be sanctified in truth.” 

 

Jesus’s assumption in John 17 is that those who have embraced him and identified with him are sent into the world on a mission for gospel advance through disciple-making. His Word will go forth, and if you choose to represent Him your way instead of His, possibly it won’t happen through you.

 

Let’s determine to live as God desires—“to do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with our God.”

 

Maybe God was and is “woke”, and sent His son to live out “wokeness.”
Posted on

We Can’t Heal, If We Can’t Hear

Uncertainty abounds all over the global village, from the Israel-Palestinian conflict to the Russian autocratic policies across Europe, to the economic wrestling with China, to the hijacking in Belorussia, to the struggling survival of the Sudan. We are confronted every day with tremendous uncertainty.

 

But it is not just distant uncertainty; it is the uncertainty that has captured our land. Geographic uncertainty as rural areas are feeling neglected, disrespected, and misunderstood. The death, isolation, and job challenges caused by the pandemic. A spike in mass shootings across the country. Unruly behavior from biting on airplanes, to spitting, throwing water bottles and popcorn at NBA Playoff games to storming PGA golf fairways. Challenges to our democracy and electoral processes. Calls from a former Presidential Advisor for a military coup. Increased institutional warfare leading to an “all in on outrage” as a strategy in Congress.

 

Uncertainty that has transformed how we view people. Increased racial tension with a spike in antisemitic incidents across the country and growing Asian hate crimes. Increased police scrutiny relative to violence against people of color. An uprising of political actions to hide the violent history against Native Americans and Blacks. Dehumanization makes it easier to see people as a “temptation”; someone to eliminate or consider as not worthy of equal rights or privileges.

 

We are subject to painful reflections about the hateful, subconscious beliefs with which some continue to drape our existence. To make it worse, as Jeremiah said in Chapter 12, “we have planted and haven’t seen a harvest.” We’ve been planting since 1619. Through the various military exploits of this nation, we’ve been planting. Through the transforming revolts of each era, we’ve been planting. Through the modification of constitutional legislation and amendments, we’ve been planting. Through marches and protests, we’ve been planting. Yet, we are still not saved.

 

And in our individual lives, we all have our own stories of struggle. How are you going to meet your financial challenges? How are you going to respond to the doctor’s diagnosis about you or a family member? Feelings of uncertainty about your job or job opportunities. Will you be able to avoid the foreclosure pending on your house? Or even the foreclosure already in process; will you be able to redirect it. And when the foreclosure evicts you, where will you live. How will you make your way? We are in some difficult times.

 

What will become of this nation as two sharply contrasting visions clash on the political horizon. The topography of their outcomes will set the direction for this nation. I asked myself, what should the Churches response be? It became apparent to me our response does not need to be complicated. Some people are looking for some theological mystery to be unraveled. As the songwriter says, “Gotta keep it real simple, get right back to ground zero. When it all comes down to this: Love God and love people.” Another songwriter adds, “What if we came down from our towers and walked a mile in someone else’s shoes. If the church wants to see a change in the world out there, it’s got to start right here.”

 

In the words of the honorable Bishop Arthur M. Brazier, “We can’t just be satisfied functioning within the physical and philosophical walls of the church building.  We have to apply Christian principles to the solutions of the great social problems of our time. Our faith calls us to see civic and political responsibilities through the eyes of faith and to bring our moral convictions to public life.  As believers we are called to be a community of conscience within the larger society and to test public life by the values of scripture.”

 

The church should serve as a moral conscience to society and should seek to respond to our social, economic and political as well as spiritual needs. Faith and Justice need to become as one flesh in service of God and social transformation. Our individual activities in this regard, can be a calling only if it is viewed as a mission of service to something beyond merely our own interest.  I believe we are to articulate and live out these views in ways that are theologically faithful, exegetically careful and personally sustainable.

 

Pastor Rick Warren in The Purpose Driven Life opens with, “It’s not about you. The purpose of your life is far greater than your own personal fulfillment.” Too often decisions are based on self-interest and justified by that belief.

 

But, as with most subjects in the 21st-century U.S., opinion soon polarizes along partisan lines. This country is becoming devoid of places where differences are valued. Even in our churches, the ideological divide has become more locational than denominational as people are more likely to live and worship among people who share their worldviews and to spend free time with them. The ability to hear each other is muted by the echo chambers of political and racial speak.

 

 

When did hate become so ordinary in the church? Love, empathy, forgiveness, mercy, and compassion is disappearing. We begin to grasp divisive rhetoric and use labels as shortcuts to conversational hearing. Labeling closes minds to hearing or learning. It ignores the nuances and details of situations, then creates misinformation.

 

Some are raising objections to any attempt to “fill in the blanks” of American history. Any conversation that challenges an interpretation of America’s national identity neglects the trauma inflicted in creating that identity. National identity is divided along critical axis of class, faith, or race. Creating the foundation of the threefold objection – one, that this country belongs to a unique set of people. Two, the church supported slavery’s legacy. And three, slavery’s legacy still shapes American life today—an argument that is less radical than it may appear at first glance:

 

  • The QAnon theory is more popular today among evangelicals than people of other religions, according to a study by the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
  • States are implementing educational laws that teaching history in schools “may not define American history as something other than the creation of a new nation based largely on universal principles stated in the Declaration of Independence.”
  • The Texas Governor is threatening to withhold lawmakers pay if they don’t come back into session and vote for the Restrictive Voting Bill.
  • “We birthed a nation from nothing. There was nothing here in America before white colonizers arrived, and Native people haven’t contributed much to American culture.”
  • Backlash on the 1619 Project, which outlines the theft of labor and land, because it centers its voice on the history of Black people instead of telling a story of a glorious longstanding idea of the past – men who founded a country then built it into a Christian nation.
  • Thirty per cent of Republicans endorsed the idea that the country is so far “off track that American patriot’s may have to resort to violence” against their political opponents.
  • Senator Ron Johnson has sent letters to acting U.S. Capitol Police chief casting doubt that Officer Brian Sicknick’s death was related to the attack on the Capitol.
  • Pastor’s teaching Critical Race Theory as anti-biblical because it addresses the effect of racial bias and erosion of advances made by Blacks in the ’90s instead of only assigning individual responsibility to their outcomes.
  • The Black body is always guilty of something; therefore, whatever the police do to them is self-caused and justified.
  • Blue Lives Matter, except when conservatives attack them.
  • The Black Lives Matter Movement is a Marxist hate group and not a quest for equality, justice and humanity.
  • Biden’s presidency is illegitimate because the votes from people of color, who voted in record numbers, should not be counted.
  • Asians in America were responsible for COVID and the attacks on them are understood.
  • Native Americans were savages and their extermination by the cowboys was heroic.
  • The January 6 insurrection was a “tour of people” who are, understandably, not happy with the country’s direction.
  • Christianity and America is God’s gift to White people.

 

So many people live in a state of misinformation. What they are invested in banning is simply a complete and accurate accounting of American history! Claiming all discussions reflect “a displacement of historical understanding by ideology.” How do you heal the nation if facts are distorted and no one is listening to each other?

 

“The only problem that can’t be solved 
is the one we pretend doesn’t exist.”

 

We can’t depend on the political landscape to heal our nation.  And let’s avoid any false moral equivalency between the two parties. Historically, one side defining good for its purposes and assigning evil to the opposition has led to further social violence. Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) shouldn’t have engaged in antisemitic rhetoric. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) shouldn’t have urged anti-racism protesters to be “more confrontational.” As reported by the Washington Post, Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a star of the right, was observed accosting Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) as she was exiting the House chamber. Taylor later made negative comments connecting mask, Jews, and the Holocaust.

 

And yet Greene isn’t really that much of an outlier in the House Republican caucus alongside the likes of Reps. Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Lauren Boebert (Colo.), and other Freedom Caucus members who want a White’s only party.

 

“As believers we are called to be a community of conscience within the larger society and to test public life by the values of scripture.”

 

Posted on

Almost There, But Not Quite Yet – Part 1

What it seems like from the outside isn’t always what it’s like on the inside. Most conversational breakdown comes from a person’s own struggle. People from all walks of life struggle. Most don’t want to admit it. But when you are struggling internally, it’s hard to even attempt to understand the other sides perspective.

 

Over the past two months, our conversation on racism has intensified. As a country, we have been dealing with this issue for over 50 years. By now, we should know better. Compassion should cause us to do better, and faith should compel us to be better. “People often define racism as disliking or mistreating others based on race. That definition is wrong,” said Stephen Roberts, Professor at Stanford. “Racism is a system of advantage based on race. It is a hierarchy.”

 

It’s 2021; we’ve made some progress, but we’re not there yet. Reasonable people can see things differently, yet we seem to be devoid of the Holy Spirit’s animating movement in and through us in this hour. America is forced to face a reality and conversation some would prefer to ignore – that racism is not only alive and well, but that it is widespread. Bishop Reverdy Ransom wrote that, “despite being faithful Christians and loyal Americans, Blacks have never gotten much justice out of White Christian America. Not even Jesus has been able to break the color line.”

 

Pastors are in a prime position from which to shape how their congregation view race because there isn’t a Black heaven and a White heaven. A proper church will one day eschew the label of Black or White Church and be a Universal Church. The dark, divisive nature of politics perpetuates the socialization process by which some pastors transmit their beliefs about race to their congregation, through implicit,explicit, intentional, or accidental means. They can minimize the humanization of people by focusing on protest, policing, property, prosperity, polls, and the most insidious passivism.

 

Passivism is overlooking or denying the existence of racism to obscure reality, encouraging others to do the same and allowing racism to fester and persist; exploiting and widening the fissures that might separate us. As Phyllis Katz states, “They tend to adopt a colorblind ideology (i.e., believing that race does not matter and that conversations about race should be avoided), which leaves the observations and myths learned from the broader society unchallenged and reinforces the legitimacy of racial hierarchy.”

 

 

A large part of White America views racism as “your problem, not mine. I don’t have to deal with it if I don’t want to. Stop trying to make it my problem.”
We hear,

 

  • “At this point, the whole race thing is over. We’ve transcended it. We had a Black president, so clearly, we are not a racist country.
  • “All that stuff is ancient history; things have changed.”
  • “It’s time to get past this race thing and move on. We need to talk about more important things like the Gospel.”
For Black Americans, faith and racial justice have long intersected and as long as there is racism, there will be a need for the Black Church.
We hear,
  • “Polarization of national politics in recent years has led Black people who previously worshipped at multiracial churches to decide they belong in predominantly Black churches.”
  • “As long as the country continues to, on the one hand, say: ‘There’s no such thing as race and we’re all one,’ but on the other hand effectively live as if that is not the case, as if it doesn’t matter, then we will always seek out a separate faith-based place to express who we are.”
  • “Some are leaving those churches because they’re disillusioned with the fact that those leaders either avoid altogether or don’t speak adequately to the issues with their congregations.”

 

According to Glenn Singleton, these conversations are difficult because people have very different communication styles and desired outcomes. For many people of color, a productive conversation about race is, in and of itself, healing, whereas for many White people, the conversation is often viewed as threatening, especially when it appears to have no concrete resolution, focused action, or determined result. And especially if it requires personal accountability to a solution.

 

The country has become split into camps that don’t just disagree on politics, policing, polls, policy, and treatment of people; they see each other as immoral and threatening. They dangerously will kill or attack members of another group, focusing less on triumphs of ideas than dominating the opposing party’s abhorrent supporters.

 

Social tribalism playing out in our political affiliations, religion, place of residence, and social status. As humans, we have an evolutionary drive to form cohesive social groups, self-identify, then stick to those groups. Most times, staying in your own group or area, hardens perceptions, preferences, and beliefs through the denial of intergroup contact.

 

This sense of tribalism affects our social health and adds to growing divisiveness among Christians. Eliminating any effort to talk to people outside your bubble; people who don’t look like you or worship like you or watch the same news channel as you as a way to bridge the divide.

 

“Groups have become bonded by faith that their side is morally superior to the other — echoing the ties that sometimes bind the religiously faithful,” according to Federal government communications strategist Clark Merrefield. Something has happened in this country that has fostered a zero-tolerance for meaningful distinctions turning minor disagreements into a cause for demonization.

 

The enemy understands our weak spots and patterns of behavior. He gets that human things will sway humans. Division based on racial differences are easy targets. Even though race is a social construct not a biological difference.

 

So, how do you engage in a conversation that is viewed as a “problem”? A conversation in which engagement is optional at best, some are reluctant to developing an understanding, and in the words of Oprah Winfred, “racism is the day-the-day wearing down of the spirit.”

 

In the next issue, we will go to the balcony to see how we can make progress through better understanding the contextual influences, psychological processes, and developmental mechanisms that can facilitate courageous cultural conversations.

 

In the meantime, stay prayerful, God is up to something. We’re almost there, but not quite yet . . .
Posted on

A Surrendered Soul – Part 2

Christianity looks quite different depending on where and how you worship on Sunday mornings, what stories you read, what voices you listen to, and who you call a friend. People and values that shape diverse communities can conflict with each other. Determining what is actually of God and what is true only to your community requires remaining faithful to God’s nature and character.

 

In Part 1, we provided the definition of Critical Race Theory (CRT) used to refute people of color’s experiences within many Churches. I have studied several pastors who are preaching and teaching on CRT. They gravitate to 7 major assumptions to ground their teaching.

 

Before I unpack the seven, let’s go back to the balcony to remind ourselves of the prize – “setting our mind on God’s purposes, not man’s.”

 

We don’t have a lot of practice having “real talk” about race. Most times people are talking at each other. So it’s not easy for people to engage in thoughtful conversation. If human equality is a vital first principle of faith (Imago Dei), we must not scuttle it when confronting complex issues but instead place faith in God’s moral coherence and seek deeper wisdom.

 

Theology sets in the mind of people a particular psychological view of life. In other words, how you see God determines how you see people. Language is additive and can obscure and distract from a critique that should be taken seriously if we are to avoid the division currently splitting American society.

 

While social justice has taken center stage in the secular world, God is still at the center of the conversation for Christians of color. People of Color have used religious teachings to turn the other cheek, to show mercy, grace, and forgiveness. When we all come to a place of human respect, the Church can reach atonement. Until then, He is and will be the instrument to heal those who can’t find a “balm of Gilead.”

 

We know this topic of CRT in the church comes from the events of the organization BLM, which is not a faith based organization. But we must be careful not to paint everyone with a broad brush. Everyone must take time to understand the difference between the organization and the phrase that represents the sentiment of a movement. Conflating the sentiment with the organization of the same name can limit that which warrants broader discussion.

 

During the Civil Rights movement many prominent Black ministers who gathered to organize the marches and boycotts faced the same rebuke from White pastors as is occurring today. Some even thought that segregation was a biblical mandate but mainly that Christians should not concern themselves with material issues rather than simply focusing on conversion. How they treated people was of little consequence or concern.

 

God created and gave humankind the gift of free will — the gift of choice.
Our beliefs determine how we label people and situations. (Labels are the opposite of understanding). These labels serve to cement beliefs and dictate how we (and our community) choose to engage or disengage with people.
The congregation is a locus for change and transformation in society, so it will be interesting to unpack how CRT is used to analyze the tenents of fellowship within the faith community:

 

    • Loving one another (John 13:34)
    • Building up one another (1 Thessalonians 5:11)
    • Giving preference to one another (Romans 12:10)
    • Stimulating one another to good deeds (Hebrews 10:24)
    • Bearing with one another’s burdens (Galatians 6:2)
    • Being hospitable to one another (1 Peter 4:9)
    • Praying for one another (James 5:16)

 

In the next issue, Part 3, will discuss each of the seven assumptions, comparing them to the seven tenents of fellowship above, to better understand the messages these pastor’s are communicating to their congregations.

 

Let me close this issue by saying, nothing good ever happens when people care more about our differences than what we have in common. That’s why the forces that seek to divide us will never succeed over the forces of love that keep us together. It might not happen when we want, but we trust in our hope, our hope that is Christ Jesus.

 

Until then, mankind needs a fresh start to remove the stones in our hearts. The only way it can be achieved is by surrendering to the Holy Spirit. Now is the time for a fresh start in Christ.

 

 

 

Posted on

10-33. We’ve Lost The Line

The usage of the police code 10-33 means “Emergency All Units Stand By”. It’s designed to make the communication between police crews easier, faster and clearer. So today, I hope this article helps you clear the noise and filter out the rhetoric that assumes life is a zero sum game. Now more than ever, the Church is needed to demonstrate how to love one another; to love those we may consider to be our enemy, and renew our commitment to be like Jesus.

 

During the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:9, Jesus taught, “You’re blessed when you can show people how to cooperate instead of compete or fight. That’s when you discover who you really are, and your place in God’s family.”
Enjoy.

 

 

Guest Author: William Uray

 

“It is so tempting to blame those
with whom we are in conflict.
Blaming makes us feel innocent.
We get to feel righteous & superior.
And blaming also nicely deflects
any residual guilt we might feel.
We are overlooking whatever part
we may have played in the conflict
and are ignoring our freedom
to choose how to respond.”

 

 

The most difficult person we ever have to deal with in life isn’t who we imagine it to be. It’s not the person on the other side of the table. It’s the person on this side of the table. It’s the person we look at in the mirror every morning. It’s ourselves. The biggest block to our success in life is ourselves. It lies in our very human, very understandable tendency to react: to act without thinking. As Ambrose Bearce once quipped, “When angry, you will make the best speech you will ever regret.” So what’s the alternative?

 

To get a clear perspective, you have to go to the BALCONY in order to see the third side. Imagine you’re negotiating on a stage and part of your mind goes to a mental and emotional balcony, a place of calm, perspective, and self-control where you can stay focused on your interests, keep your eyes on the prize. A place that allows you to see the third side of the situation. Let me give you an example of one of my favorite negotiation stories. It’s the story of a man who left to his three sons 17 camels. To the first son, he left half the camels, to the second son, he left a third of the camels, and to the youngest son, he left a ninth of the camels.

 

The three sons got into a negotiation — 17 doesn’t divide by two. It doesn’t divide by three. It doesn’t divide by nine. Brotherly tempers started to get strained. Finally, in desperation, they went and they consulted a wise old woman. The wise old woman thought about their problem for a long time, and finally she came back and said, “Well, I don’t know if I can help you, but at least, if you want, you can have my camel.”

 

So then, they had 18 camels. The first son took his half — half of 18 is nine. The second son took his third — a third of 18 is six. The youngest son took his ninth — a ninth of 18 is two. Nine plus six plus two adds up to 17. They had one camel left over. They gave it back to the wise old woman.

 

This story is a little bit like many of the negotiations or conflicts we engage in. They seem impossible to resolve and no apparent end in sight. We start off with 17 camels. Somehow we need to step to the balcony, change our assumptions, and find an 18th camel. And if you think that’s hard sometimes, you’re right, but it’s not impossible.

 

The most fundamental way in which the third side can help is to remind you of what’s really at stake – “setting your mind on God’s purposes, not man’s.” What I learned is that one of the greatest powers we have is the power not to react but rather to go to the balcony and keep your eyes on the prize. So that’s the power I wish for you in your life – the power of the balcony.

 

SOURCE: William Ury, The Third Side: Why We Fight and How We Can Stop